Providing Marketing Strategies Based on Studying the Role of Passion toward Brand, Self-Expression and Self-Brand Integration in Building Brand Trust

Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of business management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad university, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of business management, Central Tehran Branch ,Islamic Azad university, Tehran, Iran.


In the recent years, the creation of the customer involvement with a brand has been considered as one of the strategic requirements of companies, and the creation and maintenance of emotional communication with a brand has provided a basis for deep communication between the customer, brand, and long-term profitability. The purpose of this study is to examine emotional links with brands, to provide marketing strategies based on these perceptions and to provide long-term management of markets. First, and according to the review of literature, the research model was developed and tested. The research populations were from universities, shopping centers and customers who referred to brand agencies. The random sampling and questionnaire were used. The final model that we have developed and the results from the structural equation technique indicated that brand passion affects brand self-expression, self-brand integration and brand trust. On the other hand self-expression can affect brand trust and a brand self-brand integration. It also showed that self-brand integration has a significant relationship with brand trust. Marketing managers in order to properly and strategically manage a market and design marketing strategies need to appropriately consider the emotional variables and use them.



     Today brands are an integral part of marketing strategies (Grace & O’Cass, 2002) and in the growing competitive environment, a brand is considered to be the most valuable, critical, and strategic asset of a company. Therefore it is one of the most important tools can be used to control the customer's sensitivity to the price. Customers pay more for their favorite brand, because through the use of that brand they perceive more value in comparison with other competitors (Kabadayi & Alan, 2012; Helmig, Huber & Leeflang, 2007). As a result, all efforts of managers should be focused on building strong brands and creating emotional links between customers and in this way brands are considered to be one of the main strategies. Studies indicate that strong emotional relationships between the customer and brand influence the customer activities such as shopping, brand appreciation, brand defense, and even criticism and presenting destructive expressions on rival brands(Muniz & Hamer,2001; Park, Eisingerich & Park, 2013;Schmitt,2013). Creating such customer involvements with one brand has been considered as one of the strategic requirements of companies to build a sustainable competitive edge and predict future performance (Sarkar & Sreejesh, 2014).  considering strategies such as creating brand passion, customer-brand integrity, or generally building emotional links create a brand commitment, better management of the marketing mix, turning the customer into a tough defender of the brand, creating conative and attitude loyalty in the worst case, and creating practical loyalty at the best case (Sarkar, 2011; Hajibabaei, Esmailpour & Fallahshams, 2017; Carroll & Ahuvia,2006; Ching Chen & Quester, 2015; Albert & Merunka, 2013; Orth, Limon & Rose,2010; Swaminathan, Stilley & Ahluwalia,2009).

The conceptual model of the research would first be developed through theoretical framework and literature review. Then, the research method and model test will be discussed. The purpose of this study is to explore emotional links with brands, provide marketing strategies based on these perceptions and answer the question of how would brand passion, integrity, and self-expression affect brand trust? And how does it interact with passion, integrity and self-expression?


2. Literature review and development of hypotheses

     The results of the research show that the creation of emotional connections and passion is not exclusive to human beings and it can be formed between human beings and immortal objects (Ahuvia, Batra, & Bagozzi, 2009; Heinrich, Albrecht & Bauer, 2012; Delgado, Palazóna & Pelaez, 2017). Studies have also shown that brand passion is associated with self-expression, self-brand integration, and brand trust (Bergkvist & Bech-Larsen, 2010; Bengtsson, 2003).            

Brand empowerment makes self-expression possible for customers who use brands and helps them reflect their personality aspects and social relationships (Delgado, Palazóna & Pelaez, 2017). Then, the literature review of each variable, as well as the relationship between variables with each other is provided based on previous studies, hypotheses are developed.


2.1. Brand trust, brand self-expression and self-brand integration


     Brand trust is a very important factor in the success of the company strategies and the key determinant in the relationships between the company and the business community which encourage them to invest and create long-term relationships with the company (Sung & Kim, 2010). Brand trust is the company's anticipated capacity to meet customers' expectations (Aurier & N’Goala, 2010). The desire to rely on a brand is based on the belief that the brand resists uncertainties and risks (Becerra & Korgaonkar, 2011; Becerra & Badrinarayanan, 2013).

     Brand trust reflects the customer belief in the brand stability, consistency, competence (Delgado & Munuera,2005), honesty, responsibility (Delassus & Descotes,2013; Coulter & Coulter, 2002;), and brand support (Ferell, 2004), loyalty to the promises (Albert & Merunka, 2013), meeting customer expectation (Chinomona, 2016), and brand ability to perform promised tasks (Sung & Kim,2010; Chaudhuri, 2002). Brand trust includes both cognitive and emotional factors (Becerra & Badrinrayanan, 2013).

     The cognitive elements of brand trust include: reliability, stability, competence, and predictability of the performance of all products that come under this brand (Becerra & Badrinrayanan, 2013; Chaudhuri & Holbrook, 2001; Becerra & Korgaonkar, 2011). But, brand trust is beyond expectations of a product performances or characteristics, and includes emotional elements. That the brand takes the customer's interests into consideration through the factors like benevolence, brand honesty, and customer beliefs can fortify the basis of customer trust in the brand.  Moreover, the sense of security in the relationships between the brand and customer derive from a sense of trust in the brand. This sense of security is perceived by the trust and responsibility of the brand in safeguarding the customer's interests and welfare (Huang, 2017). In addition, trust in a brand is associated with the customer references to the brand, purchase and purchase intention (Becerra & Badrinrayanan, 2013).

     Studies show that brands which can improve the customer self-concept have the potential to increase the customer trust in the brand (Ruane & Wallace, 2015). Other studies also have indicated that customers involving themselves in purchasing behavior, have built their self-concept, and have strengthened it (Escalas & Bettman, 2005). Brands allow customers to express their identity through the creation of significant associations beyond the product's intrinsic characteristics and, accordingly, customers purchase brands not only for functional reasons but their symbolic meanings. Accordingly brands through the promotion and development of customers' self-concept add meanings and structures to their lives. Then these brands can be used as a tool for the customer self-expression (Escalas & Bettman, 2005).

     Brand self-expression is defined as the degree that a brand elevates perceived person's social identity, and / or reflects one's inside (Sarkar & Sreejesh, 2014; Carroll & Ahuvia, 2006). Brand self-expression refers to the suitability between the brand and personality of a person. It is related to the customer's self-concept. Studies show that brand self-expression is an important tool to create brand trust , self-brand integration (Ruane & Wallace, 2015), and an important factor in creating disparity of a person from others (Schembri, Merrilees & Kristiansen,2010).


     Thus, in this research, we will study the effect of brand self-expression on brand trust as one of the emotional relationships in connection with a brand. Accordingly, we have developed the following hypothesis:


H1: Self-expressive brand has significant impact on brand trust.


     As it is stated above, self-brand integration is associated with brand self-expression (Ruane & Wallace, 2015).

Self-brand integration is a psychological relationship that a customer makes with a brand. This relationship is based on stable emotional and irreversible links. when these links become stronger, the customer trust and then loyalty will also increase (Delassus & Descotes,2013) . On the basis of these links, the customer decides whether to involve in long-term and loyal relationships or not? When a brand has ability to be considered as a source or symbol to transfer meanings from a customer, it can be considered as a mirror to reflect the identity of a person. This creates close relationships between the brand and customer (Belk, 1988; Reimann & Aron,2009).

Accordingly, brand integrity occurs when a brand is merged with its current identity as well as with its ideal identity (Batra, Ahuvia & Bagozzi, 2012). Self-brand integration includes given components of desired self-identity, current self-identity, life meaning, and attitude strength. When a person is integrated with a brand, the brand delivers a proper and deep definition of the person and introduces him as someone that he wants to appear. More often, he thinks about the brand and how he sees himself is considered as an important part of.



Considering the above mentioned point, this study attempts to examine the effect of brand self-expression on self-brand integration, and the following hypothesis is stated:

H2: Self-expression has significant impact on self-brand integration.



     Other research results also show that self-brand integration can lead to brand trust (Delassus & Descotes, 2013). Accordingly, the hypothesis H3 is stated as:

H3:Self-brand integration has significant impact on brand trust.


2.2. Brand passion,self-expression, self- integration and brand trust

     Sternberg believed that love includes passion, intimacy and commitment (Steinberg, 1986). But subsequent researches showed that the origin of our tendency for love is due to our deep need for value and finding the things we can take care of, the feeling of excitement or need of things we will inspired by being with them. Therefore passion is not limited to the human being (Whang et al.,2004), and if a brand can simultaneously satisfy the emotional and functional needs, it can create special emotions and passions for the consumer (Broadbent, 2012). According to this finding, Shimp and Madden established emotional relationships between objects and humans (Shimp & Madden, 1988).

     Passion reflects intentions and feelings of a positive arousal toward a brand, in an other word, brand passion means a sever feelings of need and use of a brand (Brown & Alnawas, 2016). The research suggests that brand passions and deep feelings lead to trust (Roy, Eshghi & Sarkar, 2013), long-term relationships (Lastovicka & Sirianni,2011; Brown & Alnawas,2016). It finally leads to self-brand integration (Bagozzi, Batra & Ahuvia, 2016), positive evaluations, declarations of love (Carroll & Ahuvia,2006) and associates with brand self-expression (Sarkar & Sreejesh, 2014).



     Regarding to the above mentioned points, this study attempts to examine the effect of brand passion on self-brand integration, self-expression, and finally brand trust. So the following hypotheses are stated:

H4: brand passion has a significant impact on self-expressive brand.

H5: brand passion has a significant impact on self-brand integration.

H6: brand passion has a significant impact on brand trust.








Fig.1: The relation among the main research constructs







3. Research methodology


3.1. Research type

     The present study seeks to add knowledge, to make much more understanding in the field of ‚Äč‚Äčemotional links with the brand and to extend the boundaries of existing fundamental knowledge. Since it focuses on the exact description of the variables belong to the problem model, it is considered in the field of descriptive research.


3.2. Data collection

     First, the literature was reviewed. According to these studies, the concepts and relationships between them were identified and the research hypotheses were formed. Then, the research model was stated.

    Like most studies on emotional links with brand, the research populations were universities, shopping centers, and brand communities. The criteria for selecting individuals in these communities was also consistent brand use without any brand changes over a long period of time (considering the fact that the customer had ability to change the brand) and / or the customer's emotional statements about the brand. In some studies, these conditions have not also been included, and only access has been the criterion of sample selection (Unala & Aydn, 2013; Ching Chen & Quester, 2015; Yao, Chen & Xu, 2015; Ranfagni & Guercini, 2014). Therefore, in this study, universities participants, shopping centers and the customers who refer to the brand agencies were considered. Sampling method in this phase was random sampling. The sample size was n=400.To measure brand passion and self-brand integration, Batra et al. questionnaire was used. Sarkar and Sreejesh self-expressive brand questionnaire was used to measure self-expressive brand. Brand trust was measured through Ching Chen & Quester questionnaire and Hegner & Jevons questionnaire. Additionally, brands of Sony, Adidas, Apple, Gucci, Tommy Halfier, were the reviewed ones.


 4. Data analysis

 After data collection, SPSS software was used to describe the data. In order to analyze the data and test the hypotheses of the research, inferential statistics, structural equation modeling and PLS software have been used. According to the findings, male participants constitute 48.2 percent of the sample and the rest of them were 51.8 percent of women. Among all the participants 17.5 percent did not have high school degree, 38.7 were undergraduates, 21.9 percent were bachelors and 16.1 percent were with master degree. The smallest share belonged to respondents with PhD degree which stands at 5.8 percent. 5 numbers of them (3.6%) were below 18 years, 57 participants (41.6%) were 24-18 years, 47 numbers (34.3%) were 25-31 years, and 27 of them (19.7%) were 39-45. There was one (0.7) respondent who was 46-52 years old.


5. Research Model Verification

The research model was verified at three stages: measuring model, structural model, and holistic evaluation.


5. 1. Measuring model verification

The obtained results concerning the tool’s validity and reliability have been presented in the following tables(see Table 1 & Table 2).

 Considering table 1, Cronbach’s alpha and composite reliability values were greater than 0.7 for all variables that testifies proper internal reliability for measuring model. Also, Average Variance Extracted (AVE) was above 0.5 for all variables which has revealed high correlation between each construct and its relative indexes. Higher values for correlation correspond with more desired model.

Table 2 illustrates the results of discriminant validity, obtained by the use of Fornell and Larcker’s approach. It is clear in the table, that values in the main diagonal are greater than those below. This indicates desirable discriminant validity for our model (Fornell & Larcker, 1981).


5. 2.  Verification of Structural model

     In this part, we initially examined R2 values. These values indicate impacts that an extrinsic variable has on an intrinsic one. Next, Q2 measure reflecting model’s ability in prediction is discussed (Davari & Rezazadeh, 2016). Finally Z coefficients and t-values have been estimated and based on the obtained data, we evaluated the credibility of our hypothesis.



R2 criterion

     R2 values correspond with intrinsic constructs of a model. Greater R2 values indicate higher fitness levels for the model. Chin has proposed 0.19, 0.33 and 0.67 as indicating values of low, medium, and high R2 levels, respectively (Davari and rezazadeh, 2016). Thus, the results shown in the table below prove significant fitness levels for the proposed model (see Table 3).


Q2 criterion

     The Q2 measure determines model’s ability in model prediction. Considerable ability of prediction have been proven in the model Values greater than 0.35 (Davari & Rezazadeh, 2016).  it can be seen in the obtained results, that values are greater than 0.35. This indicates the model’s desirable ability in prediction. (see Table 4).





Tab.1: validity and reliability results of research model variables

Cronbach's alpha


Composite Reliability (CR>0.7)

convergent validity (AVE>0.5)





Brand trust




Self-expressive brand




brand passion




Self-brand integration


Tab.2: discriminant validity results

Self-brand integration

brand passion

Self-expressive brand

Brand trust






Brand trust





Self-expressive brand





brand passion





Self-brand integration


Tab.3: R2 values for diagram model of the study



R Square

Self-brand integration


Self-expressive brand


Brand trust



Tab.4: Extracted Q2 values for the proposed model


Construct Cross validated Redundancy




Q² (=1-SSE/SSO)





Self-brand integration




Brand Passion




Self-expressive brand




Brand trust






Hypothesis verification based on Z coefficients or t-values

     Z coefficients or t-values are utilized to understand how fit a structural model stands? T-values are one of the criteria that determine the construct relations in a model (in the structural part). One of research hypothesis is approved by the verification of constructs relations and greater significance levels of 95%, 99% and %99.9 in comparison with t-values of 1.96, 2.27, and 2.58, respectively (Davari & Rezazadeh, 2016) (see Table 5).According to the research data and the calculated statistics, all the research hypotheses have been confirmed, given that t-value is greater than 1.96. In addition, based on the standard coefficients, the following results have been obtained:

-          Self-expressive brand variable explains 0.536 variations in brand trust (H1).

-          Self-expressive brand variable explains 0.926 variations in self-brand integration (H2).

-          Self-brand integration variable explains 0.611 variations in brand trust (H3).

-          Brand passion variable explains 0.956 variations in self-expressive brand (H4).

-          Brand passion variable explains 0.779 variations in self-brand integration (H5).

-          Brand passion variable explains 0.22 variations in brand trust (H6).


5. 3.  General fitness (the whole model) and the GOF criterion

     GOF is a criterion corresponding with models of structural equations as a whole. In another word, scientists carry on the general fitness evaluation through following the measurement fitness and structural part evaluation of the model. GOF criterion was developed by Tanenhaus et al (2004). estimations have been done through:

     Where    represent common values for each construct and  equals average R2 values for intrinsic constructs of the model illustrated inside circles as outputted by PLS. Watzals et al. (2009) proposed 0.01, 0.25, and 0.36 as values indicating low, medium, and high levels of GOF, respectively (Davari & Rezazadeh, 2016). As estimated by goodness of fit calculations, general model fitness stands at 0.822, since they claim greater than 0.36 are considered as favorable values. Results are provided in the table 6.

Tab.5: Research hypothesis verification



Path Coefficient


H1: Self-expressive brand has significant impact on brand trust.




H2: Self-expressive brand has significant impact on self-brand integration.




H3: self-brand integration has significant impact on brand trust.




H4: brand Passion has significant impact on self-expressive brand.




H5: brand Passion has significant impact on self-brand integration.




H 6: brand Passion has significant impact on brand trust.







Tab.6: Communality values




Self-brand integration


Brand Passion


Self-expressive brand


Brand trust








= =0.814



= 0.822



6.Conclusion and discussion

     Brand passion reflects the passionate feelings of the customer toward a brand. The results of this study showed that brand passion has a significant relationship with self-expression, trust and self-brand integration. Other research findings suggested that brand passion and deep feelings lead to trust, log-term relationships, brand integrity, affiliation, positive assessment, romantic statements about the brand, and etc (Roy, Eshghi & Sarkar, 2013;  Lastovicka & Sirianni,2011; Brown &  Alnawas, 2016; Bagozzi, Batra & Ahuvia, 2016; Carroll & Ahuvia,2006). In addition, if the company can raise this feeling in the customer that its brand, better than other brands, is able to satisfy customers' needs and demands, it can create a sense of trust in the customer. The result of such trust is the creation of a security sense in the customer, brand honesty, competence and strong passion (Ahmed, Rizwan & Ahmad, 2014; Huang, 2017; Coulter & Coulter, 2002; Albert & Merunka, 2013).     Creating brand energy leads to improvement of brand impression and positive experiences, and finally brand passion. Reinforcing emotional links can also help create trust in a brand. Among these, advertising the brand should include emotional content. Feelings and contents are among the most effective stimulus for developing individual feelings about a brand. Creating a distinctive and recognizable meaning for brand is an effective factor on creating and strengthening brand trust and emotional links with customers. The brand meaning has a dual effect on customers' perception. First, it reflects the brand's quality, and then it creates emotional benefits, such as the satisfaction with brand use and ownership, as well as a tool for self-expression and personality identity. In another way, the brand's meaning brings brand trust and integrity by brand passion. Sarkar and Sreejesh's findings also have confirmed that brand passion is related to brand self-expression (Sarkar & Sreejesh, 2014). Studies suggest that customers by involving in purchasing behavior build and reinforce their self-concept. In the meantime, brands that have ability to improve the customer's self- concept have the potential to increase the customer trust in a brand (Ruane & Wallace,2015; Escalas & Bettman, 2005). They allow customers to express their identity through the creation of meaningful associations beyond the intrinsic characteristics of the product. Accordingly, brands, through the reinforcement and development of customers' self- concept, add meanings and structures to their lives (Ruane & Wallace, 2015) and they can be used as a tool for the customer self-expression. Brands with strong self-expression have the potential for more customer's social identity growth (Sarkar & Sreejesh, 2014; Carroll & Ahuvia,2006). The present study showed that self-expression has a significant effect on brand trust and self-brand integration. Brand self-expression is related to the customer self-concept. Studies show that brand self-expression is an important tool for creating brand trust and self-brand integration (Ruane & Wallace, 2015), as well as an important factor in creating the individual differentiation from others and creating a unique self (Schembri, Merrilees & Kristiansen, 2010). Managers should strive to give their brands strong characters so that consumers can take advantage of the product characteristics through purchasing those brands, improve their social identity, and reflect their inside better. In this way, brand self-expression can be better represented. Exposing customers to the symbols of the company and put the brand at the top of the customer's mind is one of the things can be done in this way. We should pay special attention to the brand identity structure for brand self-expression strength and better customer integrity with the brand which finally lead to the creation of emotional links, trust and passion for the brand. Among these, audio, visual and verbal identities of the brand are particularly important. Specially, brand visual identity enhancement helps to illustrate the product and finally leads to brand self-expression. The product should be prominent in terms of consumption depending on the type of product, in order to strengthen brand self-expression and increase the likelihood of brand-customer emotional links (if possible). Also, in order to create stable trust in a brand, a confusing and doubtful positioning should be avoided. Creating ambiguity in a brand associations and reducing feelings to the brand lead to a reduction in brand trust. Boisvert and Burton's research suggests that appropriate branding and positioning strategies are beneficial in delivering prominence and positive emotions from master brand to new brands, and transferring trust from master brand to new brands is also better (Boisvert & Burton,2011).


7.Managerial  and practical implications

While most studies on brand affinity have taken place in both the United States and Japan (Aro, Suomi & Saraniemi , 2018), the study found that emotional links with the brand and its impact on brand confidence in Iran were also found.

Therefore, attention toward maintaining and making emotional links between customer and brand is an important factor in creating and increasing the value of the brand. Therefore, it is imperative that managers, in addition to paying attention to the specific dimensions of the product, have a special focus on aspects that have strong positive feelings toward brands such as: brand integration and brand passion.

In order to increase the passion for the customer, as stated, it should be used as an ongoing activity from energy injection to the brand. To this end, marketing and brand managers should be confident that they, at least, have one of the following characteristics in their brand:

  • • Interesting / exciting. There should be always a reason to talk about a brand.
  • • Involving/Engaging. People involve and engage with brand; brands can be part of a lifestyle or a valuable activity.
  • • Passionate/Purpose - Driven. Brand is a worthwhile goal. For example, the product line is not the source of an emotional connection with the customer, but its design for breast cancer triggers an association and leads to an audience that cares about it. This creates a superior goal in the brand.

Passive and energy-free brands are unobtrusive and reduce the likelihood of emotional dependence. A brand that does not fit and coordinate with the mental image or lifestyle of a customer has a negative self-expression (Aaker, 2014).

Advertising managers, in addition to using emotional elements in advertising, should use engagement ads and compellin ads to create brand integrity. Denny, in line with his engagement, distributed more than two million breakfasts each day in the Grand Slam competition. He also took the advantages of shindig  in the web environment.

Self-expression will result in increased perceived value of the brand (Ross, James & Vargas, 2006; Yi Lin, 2010; Broadbent, 2012; Perepelkin & Di Zhang, 2011); Brand managers should highlight brand attributes that have a greater impact on self-expression on target customers. For example, if Adidas brand stores are an important feature of self-marketing for the customers of the brand, then managers can decorate these stores in a way that creates more sense of fascination and confidence for customers. In addition, focusing on visual identity of brand can help to make brand passion and brand confidence. Managers can create memorable experiences and support and develop these experiences, through content marketing strategies, to create positive affiliations and strong brand affiliations. Links can build trust from the level of consciousness to the levels the customer's unconscious mind.

Brand managers need to keep abreast of aspirational campaigns, brand storytelling, and brand-building content in order to create deep links between customer and brand and consequently boost brand value. These campaigns increase brand passion by portraying audience dreams and ways to achieve them. Brand passion and brand integrity have a positive impact on brand confidence, and therefore the company should highlight the identity of the audience and the meaningfulness of life at all points of contact with the client and company communications. Also, creating brand communities can increase the sense of brand connectivity and integrity. Brand communities, while building stronger brand relationships, by motivating individuals toward long term engagements with the creating brand integrity and more brand credibility provide more trust for the brand.

Managers should pay attention to all messages that are about brand discontent, brand reputation, social networks, employees, salespersons, and so on. The lack of attention of managers to these messages in the short term will reduce the passion of the brand and in the long run causes rejection and hatred of the brand. This is especially likely when consumers are branded through online social networking activities in their online activities. In these networks, the creation of user-centric content increases the likelihood of a brand's aversion (Hua et al. , 2018) and brand managers, with the precise control of the content provided in these networks and the appropriate responsiveness, while reducing the likelihood of brand hate, provide the possibility of increased trust and strong emotional links, and in addition to this, special attention should be paid to this point that users of similar brands do not reduce brand passion.

Elements such as after-sales services, service quality, and effective staff training make sure that they effectively respond to the needs of customers and create a passion and emotional bond with the brand by gaining customer confidence. Increasing brand integrity and creating a positive self-image in the customer will help to make the image more valuable and ultimately increase brand confidence. Brand integration and brand self-confidence will also lead to positive word of mouth marketing and more willingness to pay for the brand, which will allow companies to get better return on investment.

Considering the pivotal role of passion and brand-building in building brand trust and value, brand awareness among the employees of the organization should be on the agenda, so that employees can properly shape this feeling at the customer touch points. Managers' attention to the use of participatory leadership styles and internal marketing and the re-positioning of core values can have a significant impact on this. Before starting to think about creating emotional links with customers, HR managers need to be able to identify the employees with respect to the company, before they can ask their employees to try to create that feeling in their customers.

Brand managers should associate activities with their brand. Nike is a good example. The brand relates the passion of consumers to running on Nike shoes (Ahuvia, Batra, & Bagozzi , 2009).

To build brand confidence with emotional clues, managers should note that a brand-driven program should not be designed or commercialized. If there is a rational fit between the design and the brand (the designs are not artificial) and the goal is planned, then the likelihood will be a sense of trustworthiness. For example, the beautiful smile curtain of Crest, a provider of low-cost dental care for children from poor families, has a clear fit with Crest.

  1. References

    1. Albert, N., & Merunka,D.(2013). The role of brand love in consumer-brand Relationships. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 30(3), 258–266.
    2. Ahuvia, A. C., Batra, R., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2009). Love desire andidentity: Conditional integration theory of the love of things. New York: ME Sharpe.
    3. Aurier, P., & N’Goala, G. (2010). The differing and mediating roles of trust and relationship commitment in service relationship maintenance and development. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(3): 303–325.
    4. Ahmed, Z., Rizwan, M.,& Ahmad, M.(2014). Effect of brand trust and customer satisfaction on brand loyalty in Bahawalpur. Journal of Sociological Research,5(1),306-326.
    5. Aro, K., Suomi, K.,& Saraniemi, S .(2018). Antecedents and consequences of destination brand love d A case study from Finnish Lapland. Tourism Management, 67,71-81.
    6. Aaker, D. A. (2014). Aaker on branding. New York: Morgan James.
    7. Bengtsson, A. (2003).Towards a critique of brand relationships. Advances in Consumer Research, 30, 154-158.
    8. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139-168.
    9. Broadbent, S.(2012). Brand Love in Sport: Antecedents and Consequences, Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Deakin University.
    10. Brown,J .,&  Alnawas, I.(2016). Service quality and brand loyalty The mediation effect of brand passion, brand affection and self-brand connection. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management,28(12), 2771-2794.
    11. Bagozzi, R. P., Batra, R., & Ahuvia, A. C. (2016). Brand love: development and validation of a practical scale. Marketing Letters, 28(1), 1-14.
    12. Batra,R., Ahuvia,A.,& Bagozzi ,R.(2012). Brand Love. Journal of Marketing, 76(2), 1-16.
    13. Bergkvist, L.,& Bech-Larsen, T. (2010). Two studies of consequences and actionable antecedents of brand love. Journal of brand management, 17(7), 504-518.
    14. Becerra, E.P., & Korgaonkar, P.K. (2011). Effects of trust beliefs on consumers’ online intentions. European Journal of Marketing, 45(6), 936-962.
    15. Becerra, E., & Badrinarayanan, V.(2013). The influence of brand trust and brand identification on brand evangelism. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 22(5),371–383.
    16. Boisvert, J., & Burton, S.(2011). Towards a better understanding of factors affecting transfer of brand associations. Journal of Consumer Marketing ,28(1), 57-66.
    17. Coulter, K. S., & Coulter, R. A. (2002). Determinants of trust in a service provider: The moderating role of length of relationship. Journal of Service Marketing, 16, 35–50.
    18. Chinomona, R.(2016). Brand communication, brand image and brand trust as antecedents of brand loyalty in Gauteng Province of South Africa, African Journal of Economic and Management Studies,7(1), 124-139.
    19. Chaudhuri, A.(2002). Product-class effects on brand commitment and brand outcomes:The role of brand trust and brand affect. Journal of Brand Management, 10(1), 33–58
    20. Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M.B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81-93.
    21. Carroll, B.A., & Ahuvia, A.C. (2006).Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love. Marketing Letters, 17(2), 79-89.
    22. Ching Chen, S.,& Quester, P.G. (2015). The relative contribution of love and trust towards customer loyalty. Australasian Marketing Journal, 23(1), 13–18.
    23. Delgado,E., Palazóna,M., Pelaez,J.(2017). This anthropomorphised brand is so loveable: The roleof self-brand integration. Spanish Journal of Marketing,21(2), 1-13.
    24. Delgado, E., & . Munuera, J.(2005). Does brand trust matter to brand equity?. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 14(3), 187–196.
    25. Delassus,V.,& Descotes,R.(2013). Brand name change: Can trust and loyalty be transferred?. Journal of Brand Management,20(8), 656–669.
    26. Davari, A.,& Rezazadeh, A. (2016). Structural equation modeling with PLS .Tehran: Jahad daneshgahi.
    27. Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2005).Self-construal, reference groups, and brand meaning.Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 378-389.
    28. Ferell, O.C. (2004). Business ethics and customer stakeholders. The Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 121–125.
    29. Fornell, C.,& Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with nobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39-50.
    30. Grace, D.,& O’Cass, A.(2002).Brand associations:looking through the eye of the beholder. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal,5(2), 96-111.
    31. Kabadayi,E., & Alan,A.(2012).Brand trust and brand affect: their strategic importance on brand loyalty. Journal of Global Strategic Management,6(1),80-88.
    32. Heinrich, D., Albrecht, C.M., & Bauer, H. H. (2012). Love actually?Measuring and exploring consumers’ brand love in Antecedents of emotional attachment to brands. Kentucky: Routledge.
    33. Huang,C.(2017). The impacts of brand experiences on brand loyalty: mediators of brand love and trust, Journal of Management History,55(5),915-934.
    34. Hegner, S. ,& Jevons, C.(2016).Brand trust: a cross-national validation in Germany, India, and South Africa Journal of Product & Brand Management,25(1),58–68
    35. Helmig, B., Huber, J.A.,& Leeflang , P. (2007). Explaining behavioural intentions toward co-branded products. Journal of Marketing Management, 23(3), 285-304.
    36. Hua, M., Qiub, P., Wanc, F.,& Stillmand, T.(2018). Love or hate, depends on who's saying it: How legitimacy of brand rejection alters brand preferences. Journal of Business Research,90(1),164-170.
    37. Hajibabaei, H.,Esmailpour, H.,& Fallahshams, M.(2017). Study of hidden layers of consumer behavior: Interaction Enneagram and brand emotional dimensions. Iranian journal of management sciences,11(44),103-126.
    38. Lastovicka, J.L.,& Sirianni, N.J. (2011). Truly, madly, deeply: consumers in the throes of material possession love. Journal of Consumer Research,38(2),323-342.
    39. Muniz, A.M.,& Hamer, L.O. (2001).Us versus Them: oppositional brand loyalty and the cola wars. Advances in Consumer Research,28(1), 355-361.
    40. Orth, U. R., Limon, Y., & Rose, G. (2010). Store-evoked affect, personalities, and consumer emotional attachments to brands. Journal of Business Research, 63(1), 1202–1208.
    41. Park, C.W., Eisingerich, A.B.,& Park, J.W. (2013), “Attachment-aversion (AA) model of customer-brand relationships. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(2),229-248.
    42. Perepelkin, J.,& Di Zhang, D. (2011). Brand personality and customertrust in community pharmacies. International Journal of harmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing,5(3): 175-193.
    43. Ruane, L.,& Wallace,E.(2015). Brand tribalism and self-expressive brands: social influences and brand outcomes. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 24 (4),1-40.
    44. Reimann, M.,& Aron, A. (2009).Self-expansion motivation andinclusion of brands in self. New York:Society for Consumer Psychology.
    45. Ranfagni, S.,& Guercini, S.(2014). An interdisciplinary method for brand association research. Management Decision, 52(4),724-736.
    46. Roy.S.,Eshghi,A.,&Sarkar,A.(2013).Antecedents and consequences of brand love. Journal of Brand Management, 20(4),325-332.
    47. Ross, S. D., James, J. D., & Vargas, P. (2006). Development of a Scale to Measure Team Brand Associations in Professional Sport. Journal of Sport Management, 20(2), 260-279.
    48. Schmitt, B. (2013).The consumer psychology of customer brand relationships: extending the AA relationship model. Journal of Consumer Psychology,23(2),249-252.
    49. Swaminathan, V., Stilley, K., & Ahluwalia, R. (2009). When brand personality matters: The moderating role of attachment styles. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(1), 985–1002.
    50. Sarkar, A.,& Sreejesh, S. (2014). Examination of the roles played by brand love and jealousy in shaping customer engagement. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 23(1), 24–32.
    51. Sarkar, A. (2011). Romancing with a brand: a conceptual analysis of romantic consumer-brand relationship. Management & Marketing Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 6(1), 79-94.
    52. Sung, Y.,& Kim, J.(2010). Effects of Brand Personality on Brand Trust and Brand Affect. Psychology & Marketing. 27(7), 639–661.
    53. Schembri, S., Merrilees, B., & Kristiansen, S. (2010).Brand Consumption and the Narrative Self. Psychology and Marketing,27(6), 623-638.
    54. Steinberg,R.J.(1986).A Triangular Theory of Love. Psychological Review,93(2),119-135.
    55. Shimp, T.A.,& Madden, T.J. (1988). Consumer-object relations: a conceptual framework based analogously on Sternberg’s triangular theory of love. Advances in Consumer Research, 15(1), 163-168.
    56. Unala, S.,& Aydn, H.(2013). An Investigation on the Evaluation of the Factors Affecting Brand Love.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 92(1), 76 – 85.
    57. Whang,Y., Allen,J., Sahoury,N., & Zhang,H.(2004). Falling in Love with a Product: The Structure of a Romantic Consumer-Product Relationship. Journal of Advances in Consumer Research,31(1),320-327.
    58. Yao, Q., Chen, R.,& Xu, X.(2015).consistency between consumer personality and brand personality influences brand attachment. Social behavior and personality,45(9), 1419–1428.
    59. Yi Lin, L.(2010). The relationship of consumer personality trait, brand personality and brand loyalty: an empirical study of toys and video games buyers. Journal of Product & Brand Management,28(1): 57–66.